If solutions become the actual problem

Shownotes

The episode elucidates a paradox: Why solution may become the actual problem. The Coach Doc, Kai Kochmann, introduces the Effectuation Method, a systemic approach designed to cope with complex and ambiguous environments. The Effectuation method, developed by Saras Sarasvathy, explains how successful entrepreneurs act under uncertainty. Instead of starting with a fixed goal, they begin with available means (“bird in hand”) and build opportunities from there. Core principles include focusing on affordable loss rather than expected returns and forming partnerships (“crazy quilt”). The future is not predicted but actively shaped (“pilot in the plane”). The approach is grounded in empirical research on the decision-making logic of experienced entrepreneurs.

An episode designed for consultants, leaders and coaches. Get ready to become irritated!

Transkript anzeigen

00:00:01: Let me start with a slightly uncomfortable thought and feel free to disagree with me for a moment.

00:00:07: A large part of the consulting industry still operates on a very simple promise Give Me Your Problem, then I will deliver The Right Solution.

00:00:17: It sounds professional doesn't it?

00:00:19: It feels structured And To Be Fair It sells extremely well.

00:00:23: But there is small flaw in this logic that we tend to overlook In everyday practice Because in many cases The solution fits perfectly to a problem that doesn't actually exist in the way we think it does.

00:00:37: And yet, We keep doing it!

00:00:40: We build plans for futures that cannot be predicted... ...we define goals That we hope are somehow right and then we wonder why reality refuses to cooperate?

00:00:52: So maybe the real issue is not that we lack good answers Maybe the issues that we are far too quick to provide them.

00:01:14: If you take a step back and look at how most consulting work is done, We usually rely on the logic That we have all learned And for time successfully applied?

00:01:24: We define A goal We analyze The situation We create a plan Then we execute.

00:01:32: This Is thinking Behind business plans Strategies and large transformation programs.

00:01:38: To be clear There's nothing wrong with it.

00:01:40: In fact, this approach works extremely well.

00:01:43: As long as the environment is stable... ...the goals are clear and the future can be reasonably predicted from the past.

00:01:51: The challenge begins when we leave that kind of environment Because a large part today's reality is no longer predictable in that way.

00:02:01: And this where things start to break.

00:02:04: We aren't applying tools designed for a predictable world to situations that are fundamentally unpredictable.

00:02:12: And then we are surprised when things feel slow, resistance or simply don't work.

00:02:18: Effectivation offers a different perspective.

00:02:23: instead of asking how to get from point eight To a predefined point three it invites us to start with what is actually there and explore What can be created?

00:02:35: From it.

00:02:36: if you work systemically this might already sound familiar.

00:02:40: You don't assume that you know the solution, you assume something useful can emerge through interaction and shifting perspectives, dialogue or engaging with a system meaning with people involved in it.

00:02:59: This is where systemic thinking and effectuation meet.

00:03:16: Now, how does that look in practice?

00:03:17: Let me give you two examples.

00:03:20: Example number one comes from politics where everybody has solutions but no moves.

00:03:25: No imagine a mid-sized city that wants to redesign its city centre less traffic more livability More space for people and local businesses.

00:03:36: The first glance Everybody agrees That something needs to change And then almost inevitably the discussion turns To a debate about solutions.

00:03:44: Retailers are concerned about losing customers.

00:03:47: Politicians emphasise the need for change.

00:03:50: The administration brings in data, studies and best practices from other cities.

00:03:55: Everyone is doing what they have learnt to do.

00:03:58: They're trying to solve a problem And yet nothing really moves forward!

00:04:03: The reason it's quite simple... ...they try to solve problems that each of them understands In completely different ways.

00:04:11: At that point, I usually step in as a consultant and interrupt the flow of discussion.

00:04:17: For example you might say something like... and enter a different kind of conversation.

00:04:44: Instead of asking which solution is right, I ask what would success actually look like for you personally in five years?

00:04:53: And suddenly very different images begin to emerge!

00:04:56: For the retailers, success means customer flow and economic stability.

00:05:01: For the administration it means more vibrant an accessible public space.

00:05:05: For city groups that mean a place where people enjoy spending time even without consuming.

00:05:13: As these perspectives become visible, something then suddenly begins to shift from there.

00:05:18: we move on the next question What do you already have that could use?

00:05:23: start working with today?

00:05:25: And instead of developing a perfect master plan We identify existing resources An empty shop space A committed local initiative and willingness From city to allow temporary experiments.

00:05:40: What follows is not a final solution, but first step.

00:05:45: A temporary space that's used in different ways where ideas are tested and people gather real experience – this is when real development begins!

00:05:57: My second example comes from a mid-sized company.

00:06:00: I worked with the mid-size company three years ago operating internationally where the leadership team had developed clear and well structured transformation plans New structures, new processes.

00:06:12: Everything carefully designed on paper – it looked excellent!

00:06:16: In reality however the situation turned out to be much more complex.

00:06:20: cultural differences became visible and resistance emerged not openly but persistently.

00:06:26: The usual reaction in such situations is to refine the plan intensify communication And push harder for implementation.

00:06:35: Instead we decided To take a step back.

00:06:39: we shifted the focus away from the plan and towards that current reality of the organisation.

00:06:45: We asked questions like, what is already working here despite the challenges?

00:06:51: Where do we see energy and willingness to

00:06:53: engage?".

00:06:55: And instead of rolling out a transformation everywhere at once... ...we started where movement was already possible—like a pilot study!

00:07:04: Small initiatives voluntary participation real collaboration across countries, with each agreement that was made the process became more stable.

00:07:14: Not because the original plan had been perfected but because something meaningful had emerged and people were willing to support... That makes all of a difference!

00:07:37: Now what can you take into your own practice?

00:07:41: If you reflect on your own work there are a few implications which is surprisingly simple And at the same time quite demanding.

00:07:50: First, we need to become more cautious about rushing into goal-setting.

00:07:56: very often when we ask people what they want to achieve They give us answers that sound reasonable but are not yet deeply grounded in their actual situation.

00:08:07: A more useful starting point can be a much simpler question What is actually present right now and what truly matters with it?

00:08:16: Second, we may need to rethink what we consider progress.

00:08:20: Progress does not necessarily come from a perfectly designed plan.

00:08:25: More often it comes from the next steps that are feasible under current conditions – steps they do NOT put too much at risk but allow for learning and movement.

00:08:36: And third We need take relationships more seriously than usually.

00:08:42: The future does not emerge from a concept or as strategy document.

00:08:47: It emerges from interaction, From people who are willing to engage To contribute and co-create something together And perhaps it is the most uncomfortable sight in all of this.

00:09:02: We spend significant amount time producing answers Far too little making sure we're asking right questions In first place.

00:09:24: So maybe this is the key distinction to take away for you.

00:09:29: If you are valued as a consultant primarily because you can provide quick and convincing answers, You're meeting expectations but may not be creating real change.

00:09:41: However... ...you'll able shift questions in way that makes it impossible.

00:09:46: people fall back into old patterns of thinking.

00:09:49: then something meaningful begins to put it in a more provocative way.

00:09:56: Consultants who are proud of having the best answers, often part of their problem.

00:10:01: Good consulting is not about making things clearer.

00:10:06: It's about making it impossible To ignore what really matters And that sends Start asking better questions.

00:10:15: Everything else will follow.

00:10:17: That's it for now.

00:10:18: Thank you very much for listening.

00:10:19: I look forward to next episode and say Thanks for now.

00:10:24: Bye bye, I'm Kai Kaufman.

Neuer Kommentar

Dein Name oder Pseudonym (wird öffentlich angezeigt)
Mindestens 10 Zeichen
Durch das Abschicken des Formulars stimmst du zu, dass der Wert unter "Name oder Pseudonym" gespeichert wird und öffentlich angezeigt werden kann. Wir speichern keine IP-Adressen oder andere personenbezogene Daten. Die Nutzung deines echten Namens ist freiwillig.